Janzen+-+Proposal


 * Evaluation of Determining Instructional Purposes Training Program

A Proposal Submitted to Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development || Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development (FWLEDD) issued a request for proposal (RFP) for an evaluation of Determining Instructional Purposes Training Program. This document is a proposal from BMJ and Associates (BMJ) of Boise, Idaho submitted in response to the Far West Laboratory RFP.
 * Introduction **

Far West Laboratory has developed a three part training program for school administrators and graduate students designed to train learners in setting goals, analyzing problems, and deriving objectives for the purposes of planning effective school programs. Specifically the program consists of three separate units of instruction and a coordinators handbook.
 * Description of Program **

Each unit contains a series of objective specific lessons that are delivered through reading material, individual and small group activities, which reinforces text based concepts, followed by feedback for the practice activities. Small group activities are designed to simulate real world problems and process.

The units are designed to be effective taken individually, thereby allowing potential purchasers to access only the unit required, or together as an entire three part sequence of instruction. The units should be delivered by a coordinator who has previously worked through the units on their own or as a member of a training group. The coordinator is not responsible for the dissemination of any additional information outside of the training program, rather their role is strictly to organize, guide, and monitor activities presented in the program.

All materials are available in print form only and are available to be purchased as individual units or as a three-unit package. The coordinators handbook is also available for purchase.

Given that the purpose of the evaluation is to determine the effectiveness of the training program, a variety of data sources and evaluation procedures will be used to establish recommendations for continued development and investment of the instructional purposes training program.
 * Evaluation Method **

__ School Administrators __ Print samples of the training program will be sent to many active school administrators with written explanation and request for participation in reviewing the program. A follow up phone call will be made shortly after to acquire a commitment from a minimum of 25 individuals to review the program and provide feedback in the form of a survey and telephone interview which will consist of a list of consistent, objective based questions. The test group participants will be selected from the administrators group for actual participation in the training program.

__ Graduate Students __ The same selection process and evaluative procedures will be used for graduate students studying administration as the above outline for practicing school administrators.

__ Test Group __ A test group of administrators will be selected to participate in the three part training program, to be administered by one of the developers of the program form Far West. Participants will be asked to provide feedback in the form of a survey and through one-on-one interviews at the completion of each of the three units. Evaluators will collect achievement data from the participants at the completion of each unit as well as through observation of small group activities. The test group coordinator will also be interviewed at the completion of the program to gain anecdotal information based on his/her observations during the program.

__ Practical Application __ In order to assess the long-term impact of the training sessions participants will be asked to participate in a follow up survey that will examine the long-term effectiveness and practical application of the knowledge, skills, and attitudes obtained during the program.


 * Task Schedule **

The task schedule for the proposed project is shown in Appendix A. The schedule assumes a project starting date of October 2, 2011 and shows an initial completion date of February 29, 2012, followed by a long-term impact analysis on July 10, 2012.


 * Project Personnel **

Barry Janzen Mr. Janzen has been an educator in the public school system for over twenty years and possess two thirds of a Masters Degree in Educational Technology from Boise State University.

Michaela Pacesova: TBA J. Raphael Holmes : TBA

The proposed budget for the evaluation of the Determining Instructional Purposes Training Program is $27,800. A breakdown of the proposed budget and the payment schedule are shown on the following pages.
 * Budget **


 * Evaluation of Determining Instructional Purposes Training Program – BUDGET PROPOSAL **

__ Personnel __

Professional salaries: Barry Janzen: 30 days at $250/day Michaela Pacesova: 30 days at $250/day

J. Raphael Holmes: 30 days at $250/day

Project Secretary: 25 days at $120/day


 * TOTAL PERSONNEL: **

__ Travel and per Diem __ Five 2-day round trips: Boise to Far West Labs (includes per diem)


 * TOTAL TRAVEL AND PER DIEM **

__ Communication __ s Telephone (Estimated average of $100 per month for 10 months) Postage


 * TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS **

__ Supplies, Materials and Photocopying __ Supplies and Photocopying Materials


 * TOTAL SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS **


 * TOTAL BUDGET **

$7500.00 $7500.00  $7500.00

$3000.00


 * $25,500.00 **

$2500.00


 * $2500.00 **

$1000.00

$300.00


 * $1300.00 **

$500.00 $500.00


 * $1000.00 **


 * $27,800.00 **


 * Requested Payment Schedule **

Upon completion of Step 8 of task schedule

Upon completion of step 13 of task schedule

Upon completion of step 16 of task schedule

$9270.00

$9270.00

$9260.00

The test group will also be selected at this time. || BMJ || October 31, 2011 ||
 * Appendix A **
 * Task Schedule **
 * **Task** || **Agency Responsible** || **Deadline Date** ||
 * 1. *Meet with Far West staff to discuss IPTP evaluation proposal and revisions. || BMJ || October 2, 2011 ||
 * 2. Provide feedback for implementation into evaluation || Far West || October 5, 2011 ||
 * 3. Development and submission of EPD (evaluator’s program description) to Far West || BMJ || October 14, 2011 ||
 * 4. Submit data collection documents including all surveys and interview protocol for all participating parties to Far West for review and approval. || BMJ || October 14, 2011 ||
 * 5. Provide feedback for revision || Far West || October 19, 2011 ||
 * 6. Identify potential participating administrators and graduate students - mail out sample training packages and information documents. || BMJ || October 24, 2011 ||
 * 7. Follow up contact made to recipients of mail out and confirmation of a minimum number in each sample group. (25 administrators and 25 graduate students)
 * 8. Survey information collected and telephone interviews conducted from administrators and graduate students. || BMJ || November 21, 2011 ||
 * 9. *Formative assessment report to Far West based on data gathered to this point in the evaluation. || BMJ || November 25, 2011 ||
 * 10. Revisions to data collection instruments and recommendations for changes to evaluation for the trial run. || Far West || December 2, 2011 ||
 * 11. Test Group trial run of program begins. || BMJ || January 6, 2012 ||
 * 12. Completion of trial run and collection of data. || BJA || February 3, 2012 ||
 * 13. *Meeting with Far West to discuss data and analysis. || BJA || February 15, 2012 ||
 * 14. *Submission of final report and recommendations to Far West. || BJA || February 29, 2012 ||
 * 15. Collection of Long Term Data (survey/interviews) based on practical application and impact of training program from test group subjects. || BJA || June 29, 2012 ||
 * 16. *Updated report and recommendations to Far West. || BJA || July 10, 2012 ||